What You Should Know

An AI-generated overview of this parcel — zoning context, recent activity, and what matters most for redevelopment.

Zoning & Land Use

Zoning DistrictIRMX - Industrial Residential Mixed-Use

Building TypeAUTO RETAIL CAR LOT FRAME

CategoryCOMMERCIAL

Year Built1925

Valuation & Sales

Market Value (TY2027)$167,400

Last Sale Price$60,000

Last Sale DateApril 26, 2001

Taxable Land$117,100

Taxable Building$50,300

Homestead ExemptionNone

Physical Characteristics

Total Lot Area7,225 sq ft

Livable Area744 sq ft

Frontage50 ft

Depth144 ft

Stories1

UnitsN/A

BedroomsN/A

BathroomsN/A

Exterior ConditionAverage

GarageN/A

Ownership

OwnerJamison Mariea

Owner 2Mack Terrance

Political Representation

City Council DistrictN/A

City Council MemberN/A

Ward40

PA House DistrictN/A

PA House RepresentativeN/A

PA Senate DistrictN/A

PA Senate RepresentativeN/A

Congressional DistrictN/A

Congressional RepresentativeN/A

Census Tract63

Activity Timeline

Nearby Activity

Comparable Sales

Two different questions, answered together: what this property is worth as built, and what the land underneath it is worth on its own. Not an appraisal.

Building value

Arm's-length sales of similar nearby homes — prices the structure.

Land value

Vacant-land and teardown sales — prices the lot on its own.

Sale-by-sale detail

Buildable CapacityBeta

IRMXIndustrial

Zoning Envelope

Max Height: 60 ft; 5 stories
Lot Coverage: 75%
FAR: 5.0x; 500%
Max GFA: 27,094 sf; Height-limited to 375% of lot
Max Units: 36; Height-limited

Building Code (IBC Ch. 5)

Construction Type: Type II-B; noncombustible · ~$122/sf base
Net Realizable Units: 36; 80% net-to-gross vs. 36 gross

Realizing this zoning envelope needs about 5 stories — above the 4-story wood-frame limit — so it requires Type II-B (noncombustible or mass timber). Zoning permits the density; the building code raises the hard cost to reach it.

Model a specific massing to see the construction type it requires (zoning capacity above is unchanged):

StoriesFloor plate (SF)

By-right capacity based on Philadelphia Zoning Code §14-701. Actual development potential may vary based on overlays, variances, setbacks, parking requirements, and site conditions.Utilization and redevelopment potential data will be available after the next data update.

Bonuses and Policy ScenariosBeta

Toggle a bonus or policy scenario to see how it affects feasibility. Selections here update the Pro Forma card below, including its Excel export. Not law today scenarios are hypothetical only — not something available under current Philadelphia zoning code.

Select a scenario above to compare against the base case

3D Massing

Development Pro FormaBeta

Yield on cost:Marginal10-yr IRR:−Doesn't Pencil

Market data: Citywide submarket

Total Dev Cost

$8.0M

$220,844/unit

Stabilized NOI

$437K

Yield on Cost

5.5%

Below 6% threshold

Equity Multiple

2.15x

36 units / Type III/IIA (5-over-1 podium)

Revenue

Gross Potential Rent$666K

Blended Market Rent (at delivery)$2.56/sf/mo

Effective Gross Income$618K

Development Cost

Land & Acquisition$146K

Hard Costs$5.6M

Soft Costs$2.2M

Total Development Cost$8.0M

10-yr IRR

8.9%

Below 15% threshold

Cash-on-Cash

2.4%

DSCR

1.18x

Target: 1.20x+

Year 10 NOI

$574K

Net Sale Proceeds

$4.7M

at 6.5% cap

LIHTC Screening Beta

9% Credit

Screening-level LIHTC feasibility based on the market-rate pro forma above. Not a substitute for a qualified LIHTC consultant.

Income Mix Preset

30/50/60% AMI — strong PHFA scoring

Affordable %

Investor $/Credit

Grants / Subsidies

Receives federal assistanceHOME, CDBG, HOPWA, HTF, project-based vouchers. Triggers §504 (5% accessible + 2% hearing/vision). The credit alone does not.Elevator buildingBrings every unit into Type B scope instead of the ground floor only. Defaulted from the modeled story count.

Prevailing wageApplies once a project receives $100K+ in city financial assistance (e.g. City Gap Financing, the typical LIHTC subsidy source).Land Bank disposition ($1 nominal)Models this parcel as if acquired via the Land Bank at nominal cost — not yet an active City program for LIHTC deals.

9% Annual Credit

$765K

$6.9M total equity

4% Annual Credit

$340K

$3.1M total equity

Eligible Basis

$8.5M

100.0% applicable

Surplus (9%)

$3.0M

Fully funded

Recommendation

36 units — 9% credit is the viable path. Produces $6.9M equity. Bond issuance costs make 4% uneconomical at this scale. 60 units is the practical max for 9% deals.

Income Averaging (IRC §42(g)(1)(C))

Compliant

Avg AMI: 51.7% (max 60%)

Affordable Units: 36 / 36

Applicable Fraction: 100.0%

Sources of Funds

LIHTC Equity (9%)

$6,883,173

Permanent Debt

$4,722,299

Total Sources$11,605,472

Surplus$2,962,117

Accessibility requirements36 units

Type A (fully adaptable)

IBC §1107.6.2.2.1 — 2% above 20 units

Type B / Fair Housing

IBC §1107.6.2.2.2 — elevator brings all units into scope

§504 mobility-accessible

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

§504 hearing / vision

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

QCT/DDA 130% basis boost not yet implemented — check HUD QCT map manually.

100% affordable — eligible for landscape buffer exemption (§14-705(1)), reducing site costs.