What You Should Know

An AI-generated overview of this parcel — zoning context, recent activity, and what matters most for redevelopment.

Zoning & Land Use

Zoning DistrictRM1 - Residential Multi-Family

Building TypeROW 2 STY MASONRY

CategorySINGLE FAMILY

Year Built1920

Valuation & Sales

Market Value (TY2027)$120,900

Last Sale Price$11,500

Last Sale DateJuly 3, 1972

Taxable Land$24,180

Taxable Building$96,720

Homestead ExemptionNone

Physical Characteristics

Total Lot Area1,230 sq ft

Livable Area960 sq ft

Frontage16 ft

Depth77 ft

Stories2

Units1

Bedrooms3

Bathrooms1

Exterior ConditionAverage

GarageN/A

Ownership

OwnerJames E Thompson

Owner 2Margaret M

Political Representation

City Council DistrictN/A

City Council MemberN/A

Ward40

PA House DistrictN/A

PA House RepresentativeN/A

PA Senate DistrictN/A

PA Senate RepresentativeN/A

Congressional DistrictN/A

Congressional RepresentativeN/A

Census Tract62

Activity Timeline

Nearby Activity

Comparable Sales

Two different questions, answered together: what this property is worth as built, and what the land underneath it is worth on its own. Not an appraisal.

Building value

Arm's-length sales of similar nearby homes — prices the structure.

Land value

Vacant-land and teardown sales — prices the lot on its own.

Sale-by-sale detail

Buildable CapacityBeta

RM-1Multi-Family Residential

Zoning Envelope

Max Height: 38 ft; 3 stories
Lot Coverage: 75%
FAR: —
Max GFA: 2,768 sf
Max Units: 3; Coverage × height

Building Code (IBC Ch. 5)

Construction Type: Type V-B; wood frame · ~$100/sf base
Net Realizable Units: 3; 83% net-to-gross vs. 3 gross

Model a specific massing to see the construction type it requires (zoning capacity above is unchanged):

StoriesFloor plate (SF)

By-right capacity based on Philadelphia Zoning Code §14-701. Actual development potential may vary based on overlays, variances, setbacks, parking requirements, and site conditions.Utilization and redevelopment potential data will be available after the next data update.

Bonuses and Policy ScenariosBeta

Toggle a bonus or policy scenario to see how it affects feasibility. Selections here update the Pro Forma card below, including its Excel export. Not law today scenarios are hypothetical only — not something available under current Philadelphia zoning code.

Select a scenario above to compare against the base case

3D Massing

Development Pro FormaBeta

Yield on cost:+Pencils10-yr IRR:Marginal

Market data: Citywide submarket

Total Dev Cost

$630K

$209,889/unit

Stabilized NOI

$48K

Yield on Cost

7.6%

Above 6% threshold

Equity Multiple

2.67x

3 units / Type V Wood Frame

Revenue

Gross Potential Rent$68K

Blended Market Rent (at delivery)$2.56/sf/mo

Effective Gross Income$63K

Development Cost

Land & Acquisition$50K

Hard Costs$414K

Soft Costs$165K

Total Development Cost$630K

10-yr IRR

12.1%

Below 15% threshold

Cash-on-Cash

5.1%

DSCR

1.31x

Target: 1.20x+

Year 10 NOI

$56K

Net Sale Proceeds

$441K

at 6.5% cap

LIHTC Screening Beta

Not Applicable

Screening-level LIHTC feasibility based on the market-rate pro forma above. Not a substitute for a qualified LIHTC consultant.

Income Mix Preset

30/50/60% AMI — strong PHFA scoring

Affordable %

Investor $/Credit

Grants / Subsidies

Receives federal assistanceHOME, CDBG, HOPWA, HTF, project-based vouchers. Triggers §504 (5% accessible + 2% hearing/vision). The credit alone does not.Elevator buildingBrings every unit into Type B scope instead of the ground floor only. Defaulted from the modeled story count.

Prevailing wageApplies once a project receives $100K+ in city financial assistance (e.g. City Gap Financing, the typical LIHTC subsidy source).Land Bank disposition ($1 nominal)Models this parcel as if acquired via the Land Bank at nominal cost — not yet an active City program for LIHTC deals.

9% Annual Credit

$57K

$0.5M total equity

4% Annual Credit

$25K

$0.2M total equity

Eligible Basis

$0.6M

100.0% applicable

Surplus (9%)

$0.3M

Fully funded

Recommendation

Only 3 units — PHFA minimum for 9% is 25 units. Too small for bond-financed 4% deal as well.

Income Averaging (IRC §42(g)(1)(C))

Compliant

Avg AMI: 53.3% (max 60%)

Affordable Units: 3 / 3

Applicable Fraction: 100.0%

Sources of Funds

LIHTC Equity (9%)

$511,839

Permanent Debt

$511,351

Total Sources$1,023,190

Surplus$341,389

Accessibility requirements3 units

Type A (fully adaptable)

IBC §1107.6.2.2.1 — 2% above 20 units

none

Type B / Fair Housing

does not apply below four units

none

§504 mobility-accessible

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

§504 hearing / vision

not applied — no federal assistance declared

n/a

Fewer than four units — IBC §1107.6.2.2.2 and the Fair Housing Act design requirements both start at four, so neither reaches this building. A confident zero, not a withheld number.

QCT/DDA 130% basis boost not yet implemented — check HUD QCT map manually.

100% affordable — eligible for landscape buffer exemption (§14-705(1)), reducing site costs.